Wireless-G
I’m proud to announce that Ruhlandpedia is now connected through a router capable of wireless-g. Finally we’re no longer using technology that has been surpassed twice. This router should be more stable which means more uptime without reboots.
Thank you Linksys, Comcast and all of your god-damn un-user friendly, unstable, bittorrent-filtering, force-me-to-clone-my-mac-address ways.
January 12th, 2008 at 8:20 pm
yay!
OMG, IMA REAL BOY
January 12th, 2008 at 10:31 pm
For the lalz.
January 13th, 2008 at 11:22 am
did you mod my drawing? thats not what i posted. i posted this:
\o/
|
/\
January 14th, 2008 at 10:19 pm
Well congratulations Jeremy…reading your quasi-anecdote, there is no such things as real atheists. Reason being that when things happen, they still say God.
January 15th, 2008 at 6:47 pm
psssh… that’s just cultural. “god dammit” used to get more of a reaction that just “dammit,” hence, it is better suited to the needs of vulgarity. if a non god derived sear word was available (culturally, nut just it exists), then that would be used instead.
*screem*
semantics!!!!! ahhhhhhhhh!
January 15th, 2008 at 8:02 pm
Sifunibibada! Anyway, what exactly is a “real atheist”? I can be a real scientist and still make references to magical creatures regardless of their state of existence.
January 18th, 2008 at 11:31 pm
Exactly, there are none.
January 19th, 2008 at 1:03 am
So there’s no real scientist, no real atheists, magical creatures or gods, ah fuck it, nothings real anymore.
January 20th, 2008 at 12:48 pm
it’s belief that defines it. you can reference griffins and unicorns, but you don’t think that you will find one on your way to the grocery store. besides, atheism doesn’t imply that you don’t believe in anything that can’t be proven, it implies that you don’t believe in god. athiests can be hallow eathers if they want to be. you confuse atheism with rationalism (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationalism). philosophy for the win!
January 21st, 2008 at 3:00 am
Sorry for the confusion……….never knew the difference……however if you do believe in magical creatures, or in everything else known to man, why not God?
January 21st, 2008 at 10:29 am
that gets to individual territory. every one is different. (I, personally, don’t believe in magical creatures.)
January 21st, 2008 at 11:25 am
Well, personally I don’t have any problem with an omnipotent being existing, just not the judaeo-christian god who seems to act irrational if writings about eir (spivak pronouns ftw!) can be believed. Same with magical creatures, no unicorns or fairies, but who’s to say that bacteria living deep below the earth aren’t drawing energy from beyond the sub-ether to catalyze their deuterium stores?
January 21st, 2008 at 5:49 pm
Well excuse me, I wasn’t really trying to find out what everyone else believed in. Usually, the stereotypical atheists that I knew were commies, scientists, and teens who ran away from God…….but then that is a different argument.
January 22nd, 2008 at 10:24 am
ײַ האייט קמקאַסט אַלסאו
January 22nd, 2008 at 8:09 pm
So it was you who left that comment all that time ago that I could never decipher?